header-logo header-logo

03 May 2023
Issue: 8023 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Profession , Mental health , Career focus
printer mail-detail

Senior law firm members tasked with building culture of fairness & respect

Solicitors have been issued with updated guidance on health and wellbeing in the workplace.

The updates encompass rules introduced in April, following approval by the Legal Services Board. They include specific obligations in the codes of conduct for both firms and individuals to treat colleagues fairly and with respect, and not to engage in bullying, harassment or unfair discrimination. They also clarify the Solicitors Regulation Authority’s (SRA’s) approach where a solicitor’s health issues may affect their ability to practise or to participate in SRA enforcement processes.

The SRA amended its initial proposal to require solicitors to challenge any unfair treatment they witnessed. Instead, this requirement is imposed on the top managers of firms such as partners. Under the guidance, firms are expected to build a working culture where junior staff feel able to complain without fear of recriminations.

When assessing unfair treatment, the SRA will take into account whether it could reasonably be seen by others as intended to bully, belittle, harass, intimidate, undermine or take advantage of colleagues. The regulator will consider the seniority and level of control or influence of those involved, and whether individuals have specific characteristics or vulnerabilities.

‘Colleagues’ include those with whom the solicitor works closely, including contractors, consultants, barristers and experts. Managers should intervene immediately and effectively but not necessarily formally, to stop unfair conduct, and the SRA does not prescribe the manner of intervention.

Concerns about the pressures on solicitors were highlighted last year in an SRA workplace culture thematic review, and have also been raised by the charity LawCare and the Junior Lawyers Division of the Law Society.

SRA chief executive Paul Philip said law firm management becomes a regulatory issue ‘if poor working cultures start to impact staff wellbeing, behaviour and ultimately standards of service to the public’. 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll