header-logo header-logo

Divorce advice: see you out of court!

29 March 2024 / Joanna Newton
Issue: 8065 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Family , Divorce , Mediation
printer mail-detail
166021
More separating couples are choosing less adversarial divorce processes. Joanna Newton provides an Easter refresher course on the options available
  • Discusses the options available to divorcing couples when it comes to resolving disputes, including FDR, as well as non-court-based options such as private FDR, mediation, collaborative divorce and arbitration.

Court-based financial dispute resolution (FDR) hearings have always been a useful tool in settling financial disputes without the need for a final court hearing. It is up to the judge on the day to make a decision as to how a separating couple’s finances will be divided.

Gradually, over the past few years—and particularly in the wake of no-fault divorce—more couples are seeking resolution to their financial settlement through less adversarial methods. Options include mediation, arbitration and private FDRs. Family lawyers are seeing a marked reduction in the number of couples going to final hearing, instead choosing more cost-effective, less acrimonious routes to getting a consent order in place. In 2018, 14% of finance cases went

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll