header-logo header-logo

16 September 2024
Issue: 8086 / Categories: Legal News , Property , Landlord&tenant
printer mail-detail

Secure homes for tenants

New Bill to bring in immediate ban on no-fault evictions

Lawyers have given a cautious welcome to the Renters’ Rights Bill, which goes further than the previous government’s Renters’ Reform Bill.

The Bill, laid before Parliament last week, bans s 21, Housing Act 1988 no-fault evictions as soon as the Act enters into force, whereas the previous government proposed delaying the ban until after court reforms took place.

It extends the decent homes standard—known as ‘Awaab’s law’ after toddler Awaab Ishak, whose death was caused by prolonged exposure to damp and mould—to the private rented sector as well as social housing. Non-compliant landlords can be fined up to £7,000 by local councils and may face prosecution.

It restricts rent increases to once a year and to the ‘market rate’, prevents blanket bans on renting to tenants on benefits or with children, and strengthens tenants’ rights to keep a pet. An ombudsman’s service would be created to solve issues without the need to go to court.

Fixed-term assured tenancies will end, tenants will be entitled to a 12-month protected period at the beginning, and landlords must give four months’ notice to quit.

Scott Goldstein, partner, Payne Hicks Beach, said: ‘The elephant in the room is the lack of any reform of the court system, which will surely become (even more?) unfit for purpose once judges have to deal with the increased case load resulting from an increase in possession cases.

‘Another, perhaps less appreciated, point is the impact on local authorities of the significant increase in their regulatory burden stemming from this legislation. Any legal system is only as good as the smooth functioning of its enforcement mechanisms.’

Law Society president Nick Emmerson said: ‘More details are needed on how the government will ban “no-fault” evictions, while balancing tenant rights with landlords’ routes to repossessions. Maintaining this balance is key in reforming the rental market’.

Issue: 8086 / Categories: Legal News , Property , Landlord&tenant
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll