header-logo header-logo

11 June 2014
Issue: 7610 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

SARAH law derided

One of the government’s flagship bills for the new term has been dismissed by personal injury lawyers as “at best, a complete waste of Parliamentary time”.

The Social Action, Responsibility and Heroism Bill (SARAH)—also referred to as the “Heroes” Bill—is intended to protect those who step in to help others by requiring courts to take into account the context of an incident if a negligence case is brought. Writing in a blog on ConservativeHome last week, Justice secretary Chris Grayling said: “I hope that she [SARAH] will finally slay much of the “elf and safety” and jobsworth culture that holds back so much of our society.”

However, Jonathan Wheeler, vice president of the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers, says: “The Compensation Act 2006 came into force to address public perception of a so-called ‘compensation culture’. Nine years later, we have the ‘Heroes’ Bill, which is apparently designed to reassure would-be heroes who hold back because they are afraid of being sued. 

“The government would be better spending its time and resources on education rather than legislation if the aim is to deal with public perception.”

Issue: 7610 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll