header-logo header-logo

Santander panel fury

15 August 2012
Issue: 7527 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Law Society fights bank’s conveyancing panel cull

Santander and the Law Society are in discussion over the bank’s decision to drop hundreds of solicitors from its conveyancing panel.

Last year, Santander introduced a one-off fee of £199 plus an annual £99 compliance fee for solicitors on the panel. In July, however, Santander sent letters to many firms informing them they could no longer remain on the panel because they had not carried out enough conveyancing transactions.

A Law Society spokesperson says the number of solicitors affected could be a few hundred, although neither the Law Society nor Santander would know the exact figures for some weeks as an appeals process is on-going.

Some firms have appealed successfully, while others have been told their removal from the panel was a mistake, he says. Solicitors have expressed annoyance at the fact they paid a renewal fee only to be told a few months later that they had been dropped.

The Law Society has urged all affected firms to appeal, and will meet with Santander representatives shortly to discuss a possible “sustainable solution”.

Law Society chief executive Desmond Hudson says: “We retain grave reservations about the methods they are using and are concerned about the effects both on firms and consumers.”

A spokesperson for Santander says: “We continue to manage our conveyancing panel in relation to both quality and activity. Firms which do not meet our expectations are removed from the panel but always have a right of appeal.”

In January, HSBC cut the number of solicitors and conveyancers borrowers could use from several thousand to just 48, but backed down four months later under pressure from the Law Society and other user groups. Customers of the bank complained the decision, which meant they had to pay additional legal fees for HSBC’s part of the transaction, caused delays and increased the risk of house sales falling through.

Issue: 7527 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll