header-logo header-logo

The saga continues

25 September 2015 / Sally Nesbitt
Issue: 7669 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail
nlj_7669_nesbitt

Sally Nesbitt reports on holiday & sickness absence

Sickness absence and annual leave; five words to bring a shudder to employers and employment lawyers alike, jaded by years of European cases on the subject. But there may be a glimmer of hope. Building on previous European case law, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) in Plumb v Duncan Print Group Ltd (2015) UKEAT/0071/15, [2015] IRLR 711 clarifies both the circumstances and extent to which an employee is entitled to claim annual leave when off sick.

Carrying over holiday for sick workers

It is common knowledge that a worker is entitled to paid annual leave of at least four weeks under the Working Time Directive (2003/88/EC) (Directive). Regulation 13(9) of the Working Time Regulations 1998 (which implement the Directive) provides that holiday must be taken in the leave year in which it is due. It cannot be carried over, or replaced by a payment in lieu, except on termination.

“ May we sigh with relief & put this stream of case law to bed?”

Mr Plumb

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll