header-logo header-logo

20 October 2011
Issue: 7486 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Ruling ends legal limbo

The Supreme Court has ruled in favour of pleural plaques victims north of the border

In a landmark judgment, AXA General Insurance v the Lord Advocate [2011] UKSC 46, the justices held the Scottish Parliament was within its rights to pass a new law restoring pleural plaques victims’ right to compensation. They rejected insurers’ argument that the new law breached their human rights.

The new law was passed following the controversial 2007 decision of the House of Lords that the condition was harmless (Rothwell v Chemical & Insulating Co [2007] UKHL 39).

Patrick McGuire, partner at Thompsons Solicitors, which handles 90% of Scottish pleural plaques cases, said: “This is a great day for democracy because the Supreme Court has reinforced the Scottish Parliament’s right to legislate to protect the rights of its citizens.

“This verdict means that 1,200 Scottish pleural plaques victims, some of whom have been in legal limbo for five or six years, can now pursue their cases through courts. And we believe their claims will succeed.”

Laura Blane, Thompsons partner and asbestos specialist, said: “We have 650 pleural plaques cases on hold in the courts and another 450 coming through the system.”

Susan Brown, director at Prolegal, said: “This is good news for Scottish asbestos victims and restores them to the position the whole country was in prior to the judgment of the House of Lords in Rothwell.”

Issue: 7486 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll