header-logo header-logo

06 March 2013
Issue: 7551 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

RTA portal: the latest

Justice secretary sets dates & confirms cuts

Fixed costs for road traffic accident (RTA) portal cases are to be reduced at the end of April, while the expansions to the portal scheme will take place in July, Justice Secretary Chris Grayling has confirmed.

As well as reducing fixed costs, the reforms include expanding the RTA portal scheme to claims for up to £25,000, and extending it to employers’ liability and public liability claims.

Fixed costs for claims below £10,000 will be cut from between £400–£1,200 to between £200–£500.

Claimant solicitors will be able to recover fixed costs of £200-£800 for claims valued at between £10,000–£25,000, £300–£900 for employers’ and public liability claims up to £10,000, and £300–£1,600 for employers’ and public liability claims up to £25,000.

Last week, the High Court rejected an attempt by the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (APIL) and the Motor Accident Solicitors Society (MASS) to bring a judicial review against the decision to cut fixed costs.

APIL and MASS argued the decision was unfair because the government consulted insurers but not claimant lawyers and those representing victims when it reached its decision.

However, Lord Justice Elias said it was not the government’s duty to give equal weight to both sides.

“If people deem it to be unfair that is a matter for the ballot box not the court,” he said.

Rod Evans, president of the Forum of Insurance Lawyers, said: “It is pleasing to have a decision that ends the hiatus which has gripped the industry.”

However, MASS and APIL said in a joint statement: “This is a dark day for people who are injured through no fault of their own.”

They warned that injury victims may now find it “impossible to obtain independent legal representation” as a result of the judgment, and that negotiations would “inevitably be biased in favour of insurers”.

According to a Ministry of Justice impact assessment published last week, claimant personal injury lawyers will lose £200m per year when reductions to fixed recoverable costs for RTA portal claims up to £10,000 are introduced.

It stated that if caseloads remained at existing levels then claimant solicitors would lose about £200m in income, as well as “possible” loss of income from lower conditional fee agreement fees. It said the savings to insurers could be passed on to consumers through lower premiums.

About 750,000 claims valued at £10,000 or less were made last year, accounting for 90% of RTA claims.

Issue: 7551 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll