header-logo header-logo

A room with a view

19 February 2010 / Benjamin Faulkner
Issue: 7405 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Benjamin Faulkner examines whether a landowner has the right to a view

It is well known that the law does not ordinarily provide a landowner with a right to a view. In general, his neighbour is free to undertake building or extension works as he likes. In some cases the proposed works might be blocked by the planning authorities, or a management company might exercise rights to control development within a residential estate, but there is no guarantee of either eventuality.

The landowner might have a right to light which could be infringed by the proposed works, but often the development will be too far away from the landowner’s building to diminish the amount of light reaching it significantly, notwithstanding the obstruction of his panorama. In Dennis v Davies [2009] EWCA Civ 1081 the Court of Appeal confirmed that there will often be a third way: protections offered to the landowner by a restrictive covenant not to create a “nuisance or annoyance”.

The facts

Dennis v Davies concerned a residential development on

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll