header-logo header-logo

25 October 2007 / Baria Ahmed
Issue: 7294 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , ADR
printer mail-detail

Role players

Baria Ahmed looks at the many functions the expert can fulfil in ADR

A  potential expert in alternative dispute resolution (ADR) may adopt a range of roles: an expert consultant may form part of the advocacy team; a party retained expert may provide an opinion on the instructing party’s position; the parties may instruct a neutral expert, appointed through an independent body such as the Royal Institute of British Architects, chosen by the parties jointly or appointed by the mediator or arbitrator; finally, the appointed mediator or arbitrator may themselves be an independent expert in light of their experience in the subject matter of the dispute. In the case of Early Neutral Evaluations and Expert Determinations, the neutral expert is tasked with providing either an “opinion” on the applicable law or a “decision” on the facts.

Wearing different hats

ADR processes, however, permit a non-traditional use of experts. The mediator, for example, may request that the expert makes a presentation of their views with all other participants present, or bring the parties’ retained experts

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll