header-logo header-logo

Risky business

07 August 2009 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7381 / Categories: Features , Local government , Public
printer mail-detail

Dr Nicholas Dobson provides an update on local authority “wellbeing”

Back in 1903 a group of local authorities got together to form a company called Municipal Mutual Limited (MML) with a view to obtaining insurance on a mutual basis. In September 1992, however, MML ceased to write new business after making substantial losses.

A similar endeavour some 104 years after MML’s birth was to have a much shorter life.

For on 1 April 2007 it might have looked like the spirit of MML was rising from the grave when a company formed by various London boroughs to provide insurance for their corporate property, terrorism, and liability risks commenced operations. But these were to come to an abrupt halt on 9 June 2009 when the Court of Appeal decided that local authorities could not lawfully participate in a mutual insurance company.

At the same time the court found that there had been a breach of procurement rules (the Public Contracts Regulations 2006 implementing Directive 2004/18/EC) when London Borough of Brent (Brent) awarded contracts of insurance

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll