header-logo header-logo

24 January 2020
Categories: Legal News , Insurance surgery
printer mail-detail

Risks ahead for 2020

Climate change will present the greatest insurance risk in the year ahead, as the ‘Greta Thunberg effect’ creates a global conversation around its impact and the need to act, insurance firm Kennedys has said

In its annual London Market forecast for the year ahead, published this week, Kennedys predicts a new wave of climate change litigation as climate science improves and extreme weather events become more frequent, resulting in potentially massive liabilities for the insurance sector and posing new challenges for the insurability of climate-related events. There may also be a rise in reputational damage claims as corporates are held accountable for their corporate social responsibility on the environment.

It warns of UK airlines moving their operations to the EU if the Department of Transport doesn’t devise a post-Brexit solution for access to ‘open skies’ in the EU. It also expects more high-profile corporate collapses with ensuing claims as creditors try to maximise their recoveries.

There may be an increase in sexual harassment claims, with employers’ liability insurers being most at risk. Data subject claims will increase in both volume and value. Issues may arise about construction insurance, with Kennedys already seeing numerous claims with issues about pods constructed off-site.

Deborah Newberry, head of corporate and public affairs at Kennedys, said: ‘As traditional risks look different and emerging risks demand traditional policies to be considered under a new lens, the London Market will need to reassert its ability to adapt and manage the constant evolution of global risk.

‘As has been evidenced in recent years, along with industry-led measures, an understanding of potential market disrupters is vital. Anticipating changing risk perceptions remains key to retaining the unique benefits of the London Market.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll