header-logo header-logo

12 June 2008
Issue: 7325 / Categories: Legal News , Local government , Legal services , Family
printer mail-detail

Rise in care proceedings fees under fire

Legal news update

The huge increases in care proceedings fees paid by local authorities since May 2008 leave vulnerable children at greater risk of harm, lawyers say.

The government pledged to implement the increases proposed in its consultation paper Public Law Family Fees which sees court fees for care proceedings rise from £150 to £4,000.

Resolution chief executive Karen MacKay says that although the government has set aside £40m to help local authorities with the increase, this was not ring-fenced, meaning the welfare of many children might be compromised by financial considerations.

“The worry is that local authorities will run out of money to take non-emergency cases to court. This may mean leaving a child with neglectful parents or encouraging parents to agree to the child being voluntarily accommodated temporarily instead of issuing proceedings,” she says.

She adds that if local authorities consider compromises instead of issuing court proceedings as a way of avoiding increased costs, “vulnerable children will be put at risk and denied access to justice”.

The Law Society says it is fundamentally opposed to the government’s policy of full cost pricing to meet the costs of the civil and family courts, which provide a benefit for all society.

A spokesperson says: “There is currently overrecovery in relation to the civil courts, and this should be fed back into the system. There is also a strong case for public funding to support the work of the family courts in cases concerning the protection and welfare of children.”

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll