header-logo header-logo

13 September 2007 / Helen Hart , Beverley Flynn
Issue: 7288 / Categories: Features , Media
printer mail-detail

Ringing in changes?

Beverley Flynn and Helen Hart examine the recent premium phone-in competition débâcle

Television programmes which run phone-ins—often using premium rate numbers—for the audience to participate in have come under the spotlight recently. Audience participation can include the opportunity to enter a competition, to vote or donate to a charity.

REGULATORY FRAMEWORK

The current regulatory regime for communications in the UK is primarily contained in the Communications Act 2003 (CA 2003) and the Broadcasting Act 1996 (as amended), which implements a series of EU Directives. The sector is regulated by the Office of Communications (Ofcom).
CA 2003, s 319 requires Ofcom to set standards for the content of television/radio programmes. Its objectives must be to:
- protect under 18s;
- apply generally accepted standards to the contents of TV services; and
- provide adequate protection to the public against the inclusion of offensive and harmful material.

These objectives are contained in the Broadcasting Code issued by Ofcom which applies to broadcasters—although special rules apply in certain cases to the BBC.
Failure to comply with the Broadcasting Code

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll