header-logo header-logo

12 July 2007 / Seamus Burns
Issue: 7281 / Categories: Features , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Rights versus duty

Public authorities should have a duty of care to parents as well as children in suspected child abuse cases, says Seamus Burns

The Lawrence family, including the father of Stephanie Lawrence’s children, came to the attention of Pembrokeshire County Council’s child protection team in 1999. In April 2002, following sporadic and inconclusive attention from various members of that team over the previous three years, the council had placed the children on the Child Protection Register as being at risk of physical and/or emotional harm from Mrs Lawrence and/or their father. They remained on the register for about 14 months before the council removed them from it in June 2003. In December 2004, the ombudsman had upheld a number of complaints from Mrs Lawrence of maladministration against the council, and furthermore had recommended that the council should pay her £5,000 in recognition of the distress and damage to her reputation and of the time and trouble in pursuing her complaints.

Mrs Lawrence then commenced proceedings against the council, alleging negligence and a violation of her right

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll