header-logo header-logo

The Right to choose not to

03 January 2008 / Juliet Carp
Issue: 7302 / Categories: Features , Discrimination , Terms&conditions , Employment
printer mail-detail

Should employees be punished for standing up for their views? Juliet Carp reports

Employees complain about all sorts of things: hours, clothes, food, customers, even colleagues with a different background, lifestyle or opinion. Generally, an employee must comply with his employer's instructions. If the employee refuses to do so, his employer might find a way to accommodate him. If this is impractical, or the employer is unwilling to help, it could respond by instigating disciplinary proceedings, leading to a warning or dismissal. Less formal reactions from managers or colleague might include verbal abuse, a smaller bonus or a lost promotion. The employment protection available to objectors depends on the work they are expected to do, the reasons for objection and the employer’s response. Andrew McClintock, a justice of the peace who objected to the possibility that he might be required to place children with same sex couples, claimed that he had been discriminated against contrary to the Employment Equality (Religion or Belief ) Regulations 2003 (SI 2003/1660) (the regulations). On 31

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll