header-logo header-logo

Reviewing Gowers

13 April 2007 / Georgia Warren , Jeremy Drew
Issue: 7268 / Categories: Features , Media , Data protection , Intellectual property
printer mail-detail

Is the Gowers review destined to languish in a drawer? Jeremy Drew and Georgia Warren report

The Gowers Review of Intellectual Property (the review) was launched with fanfare in December 2005. Gordon Brown announced that he had asked Andrew Gowers, previously editor of the Financial Times, to conduct an independent review of the UK intellectual property (IP) framework. No small task.

A very short two-month window was imposed for any submissions. A creditable 517 responses were received from a wide range of companies and organisations, from the obvious, to the less obvious such as the rock group Pink Floyd.

The detailed 141-page report was published in December 2006 and set out 54 recommendations to “deliver a robust intellectual property framework for the digital age” including tackling IP crime and reforming copyright law to allow uses consistent with the digital age.

Gowers stated early on that he did not think that the IP system was in need of a “radical overhaul”. While this may have been a disappointment to some, it is

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll