header-logo header-logo

08 December 2020
Issue: 7914 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Review of Human Rights Act launched

A review to consider whether the Human Rights Act 1998 needs updating, led by former Court of Appeal judge, Sir Peter Gross, has been announced by the government

An eight-member panel will look at the relationship between the domestic courts and the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), including the duty to ‘take into account’ ECtHR case law. It will consider whether domestic courts are being drawn into areas of policy, and the implications of the way in which the Act applies outside the territory of the UK and whether there is a case for change.

The government said ‘the UK remains committed to the European Convention on Human Rights. The review is limited to looking at the structural framework of the Human Rights Act, rather than the rights themselves’.

David Greene, Law Society president, said: ‘The rights enshrined in the Act are core to the UK’s identity as a democratic, fair and just nation.

‘Any review of the Human Rights Act would have implications for every single one of us. There is an opportunity to establish genuine public discourse and build long lasting consensus. We hope the panel will engage extensively with the public, as this will be crucial so that ordinary people are informed about what is at stake and can have their say.’

The review will run alongside the independent review of judicial review, led by former Conservative justice minister Lord Faulks and expected to report back before the end of the year. These reviews, and others due to be announced at a later date, will inform the proposed Commission on Constitution, Democracy and Rights, which the Conservatives promised in their 2019 election manifesto.

However, Sam Grant, head of policy and campaigns at Liberty, said the civil liberties charity was ‘concerned’ by the government’s plans.

‘For years, our laws and legal processes have made sure that governments and public bodies can be challenged when they make bad decisions. The plans announced [this week] and over the past six months are focused on limiting our ability to do this.’

Shadow Justice Secretary David Lammy said it was ‘bonkers that the government is prioritising launching an attack on human rights in the middle of the coronavirus pandemic.’

Issue: 7914 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll