header-logo header-logo

11 October 2013 / Robert Hines
Issue: 7579 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Revealing assets

istock_000017611994medium

Robert Hines on the family court’s approach to orders dealing with offshore assets

In January 2013, in the case of M v M [2013] EWHC 2534 (Fam), [2013] All ER (D) 133 (Aug), Mrs Justice King made a record £53m award to a Russian wife under Pt III of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 (Pt III). In reaching this decision, King J had to consider the recent landmark Supreme Court decision of Prest v Petrodel [2013] UKSC 34, [2013] All ER (D) 90 (Jun), in determining whether residential property owned by a number of companies could be transferred to the wife, notwithstanding the corporate veil.

Background

H and W are both Russian nationals, who met in 1987 when they worked in a factory together; H was a telephone technician and W worked in the cultural department. H and W starting living together in 1989 and they were married in 1991. There are four children of the family, although the oldest two (who are both over 18) are from the parties’ previous relationships. H

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll