header-logo header-logo

Revealing assets

11 October 2013 / Robert Hines
Issue: 7579 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail
istock_000017611994medium

Robert Hines on the family court’s approach to orders dealing with offshore assets

In January 2013, in the case of M v M [2013] EWHC 2534 (Fam), [2013] All ER (D) 133 (Aug), Mrs Justice King made a record £53m award to a Russian wife under Pt III of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 (Pt III). In reaching this decision, King J had to consider the recent landmark Supreme Court decision of Prest v Petrodel [2013] UKSC 34, [2013] All ER (D) 90 (Jun), in determining whether residential property owned by a number of companies could be transferred to the wife, notwithstanding the corporate veil.

Background

H and W are both Russian nationals, who met in 1987 when they worked in a factory together; H was a telephone technician and W worked in the cultural department. H and W starting living together in 1989 and they were married in 1991. There are four children of the family, although the oldest two (who are both over 18) are from the parties’ previous relationships. H

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll