header-logo header-logo

23 February 2022
Issue: 7968 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

Respect embargo or risk contempt

Breaches of embargo on publication of the contents of a court judgment are ‘becoming more frequent’, the Court of Appeal has warned

Sir Geoffrey Vos, Master of the Rolls, giving the main judgment, promised tough action on future breaches, while acknowledging that mistakes happen, in R (on the application of the Counsel General for Wales) v Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy [2022] EWCA Civ 181, All ER (D) 79 (Feb).

The draft judgment in the case was sent by the judge’s clerk to counsel’s clerks at Matrix Chambers, with the statement that the draft was confidential and disclosure may be treated as contempt of court. However, a Matrix press release was uploaded too early, appearing on the chambers’ website, LinkedIn and Twitter. It was taken down as soon as the error was discovered and the senior practice manager at Matrix alerted the judge to the mistake, which she said occurred due to a ‘miscommunication’ within chambers.

Sir Geoffrey said: ‘I should say that I have called this case into court because, amongst other reasons, the breaches that occurred here are not alone.

‘I have become aware formally and informally of other breaches in other cases. It seems, anecdotally at least, that violations of the embargo on publicising either the content or the substance of draft judgments are becoming more frequent.

‘The purpose of this judgment is not to castigate those whose inadvertent oversights gave rise to the breaches in this case, but to send a clear message to all those who receive embargoed judgments in advance of hand-down that the embargo must be respected. In future, those who break embargoes can expect to find themselves the subject of contempt proceedings as paragraph 2.8 of CPR PD40E envisages.’

Concluding, he said it was not appropriate for persons in the clerks’ rooms or offices of chambers to see the draft judgment or be given a summary of its contents, and drafting press releases was not a legitimate activity to undertake within the embargo. He suggested one named clerk provide the link between the court and the barristers, and that chambers and solicitors put ‘proper precautions and double-checks’ in place to catch errors in time.

Issue: 7968 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll