header-logo header-logo

05 January 2021
Categories: Legal News , Family , Divorce
printer mail-detail

Research finds women’s income likely to fall by almost twice men’s post-divorce

The financial services company Legal & General has found that women are likely to have their household incomes fall by a third (33%), almost twice the decrease likely to be faced by men (18%)

LNB News: The research suggests that this could be driven by a combination of several key factors, including that women are typically paid less than their male counterparts, with the average divorcing man four times as likely to be earning more than the woman in the relationship (74% versus 18%). Further, and significantly, women are more likely to waive their rights to a partner’s pension during a divorce (28% women versus 19%) despite data showing that men currently below the State Pension age have a higher median active pension wealth (£25,300 men versus £20,000 women), and that a man’s median pension wealth for those aged over 65 is double a woman’s (£223,933 men versus £112,967 women).

Other key statistics arising from the research are:

• women are more likely to face financial struggle post-divorce (31% women versus 21% men)

• women are more likely to worry about the impact on their retirement (16% women versus 10% men)

• more men felt that the division of finances at the point of divorce was fair and equitable (54% men versus 49% women)

This content was first published by Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 4 January 2021 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at: www.lexisnexis.com

Source: The Divorce Gap – women see incomes fall by 33% following divorce, compared to just 18% for men

Categories: Legal News , Family , Divorce
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll