header-logo header-logo

Removal case highlights legal aid reform dangers

07 February 2008
Issue: 7307 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

Family Law

The recent illegal removal of a child from the care of its mother by Nottingham Social Services highlights the need for families to have access to specialist legal representation in such situations, the Association of Lawyers for Children (ALC) says.

However, ALC co-chairman Alistair MacDonald says current government policy is making it increasingly difficult for parents to find specialist family lawyers locally to represent them when social services seek to remove their children.

He says: “The government’s legal aid reforms mean the number of family lawyers available to represent the most disadvantaged families is in decline.”

A recent ALC survey shows the reforms are forcing nearly a fifth of respondents to leave the profession, of which more than half were the most experienced legal practitioners, and that 40% were intending to reduce or had reduced the amount of legal aid work they do for parents and children. MacDonald says: “What would have happened in this case if the mother had not been able to find a family lawyer to take the case before a judge so that the right decision could be made? As we have repeatedly said, a legal aid scheme that reduces the number of specialist family lawyers able to represent children and families is bad for children, bad for society and bad for the country as a whole.” He says the judge’s decision in this case shows the family justice system works effectively to promote and safeguard the welfare of vulnerable children.

Issue: 7307 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Child law , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll