header-logo header-logo

07 February 2008
Issue: 7307 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

Removal case highlights legal aid reform dangers

Family Law

The recent illegal removal of a child from the care of its mother by Nottingham Social Services highlights the need for families to have access to specialist legal representation in such situations, the Association of Lawyers for Children (ALC) says.

However, ALC co-chairman Alistair MacDonald says current government policy is making it increasingly difficult for parents to find specialist family lawyers locally to represent them when social services seek to remove their children.

He says: “The government’s legal aid reforms mean the number of family lawyers available to represent the most disadvantaged families is in decline.”

A recent ALC survey shows the reforms are forcing nearly a fifth of respondents to leave the profession, of which more than half were the most experienced legal practitioners, and that 40% were intending to reduce or had reduced the amount of legal aid work they do for parents and children. MacDonald says: “What would have happened in this case if the mother had not been able to find a family lawyer to take the case before a judge so that the right decision could be made? As we have repeatedly said, a legal aid scheme that reduces the number of specialist family lawyers able to represent children and families is bad for children, bad for society and bad for the country as a whole.” He says the judge’s decision in this case shows the family justice system works effectively to promote and safeguard the welfare of vulnerable children.

Issue: 7307 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Child law , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll