header-logo header-logo

05 February 2009
Issue: 7355 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services
printer mail-detail

Regulator unveils five-year plan

Legal Services Board aims to provide a model of regulatory excellence in legal services

New legal regulator, the Legal Services Board (LSB) has set out its vision for the next five years.

In its “Consultation on draft Business Plan 2009/10”, the LSB sets out how it intends to deliver the changes required by the Legal Services Act 2007. Its goals include more help for those whose incomes exceed legal aid thresholds but who are unable to afford legal services; greater competition in service delivery; “swift and effective redress” for consumers if things go wrong; greater diversity in the professions; and certainty and confidence in the regulatory structures underpinning the market.

Chief executive Chris Kenny said the LSB intends to establish “momentum” on all of these in its first year.

He said the LSB would “give particular priority to regulatory independence, alternative business structures, providing effective redress and working up a model of regulatory excellence in legal services”.

Independent legal consultant Simon Young said: “I think it is very encouraging to see how determined they are to get on with things.

“It is quite a useful practical document in that it sets out clearly what the deliverables are going to be in the next 12 months. I was very pleased to see that ABS’ are being addressed.”

On the LSB’s goal to help those living just above the legal aid threshold, Young said: “That’s an unusual statement for a regulator to make—I couldn’t see how they could achieve that. I can only assume they think that can be addressed by other means.” The Legal Services Board, which launched on 1 January 2009, oversees nine separate legal services regulators including the Law Society and the Bar Council, and the Office for Legal Complaints, which handles consumer complaints about lawyers. Comments must be sent to the LSB by 13 March 2009.

The LSB will issue a discussion paper on the development of Alternative Business Structures for law firms (ABS), hold a round table event on best practice across the profession in complaints handling, and consult on draft rules on approved regulator status, between April and June.

Issue: 7355 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll