header-logo header-logo

30 May 2013 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7562 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

The Regan reforms

rexfeatures_558112a

Dominic Regan is in the mood for change post-Jackson

Reform is addictive. Now that Sir Rupert Jackson has gone back to the Court of Appeal I thought I would follow in his steps and overhaul the civil trial process which is, frankly, a shambles.

The first thing that Sir Rupert did was to go on a fact-finding mission. Tough as it was I emulated him and went to Paris, Venice, the South of France, Paris and Ladies Day at Ascot. For those who sneer may I point out I spent a whole day at the Royal Courts of Justice too. Admittedly, it was because I popped in to use the free toilets and got lost but nevertheless I was there. Here are the lessons I learnt.

Fundamental failings

It was obvious to me that there are fundamental failings inherent within the trial process. The most obvious problem is that trials last too long. Mike Goodridge, clerk at 9 Gough Square, explained to me that counsel is paid for every day spent in court.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll