header-logo header-logo

Reforms to CPR on the way

03 February 2021
Issue: 7919 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has published details of a cluster of reforms to the Civil Procedure Rules, including changes on vulnerable witnesses, evidence and offers to settle.

The changes, introduced under the Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2021, come into force on 6 April 2021.

They clarify that ‘following inconsistencies in case law’, and particularly for litigants in person, an offer to settle (a Part 36 offer) can include accruals of interest but ‘where it is silent on this point, the presumption will be that the offer is inclusive of all interest’, according to the announcement.

On vulnerable witnesses, the reforms clarify that dealing with a case justly includes ensuring that the parties can participate fully, and that parties and witnesses can give their best evidence. It deals with the costs provision for additional work or expense incurred due to the vulnerability of a party or witness. This implements the February 2020 recommendations of the Civil Justice Council, in its report ‘Vulnerable witnesses and parties’, which called for rule changes to ensure all civil judges, parties and advocates consider the vulnerability of people involved in civil proceedings.

Currently, the rules prevent collateral use of witness statements outside the proceedings in which they are served. The reforms extend this rule to affidavits as well as witness statements. This implements the decision in Official Receiver v Skeene [2020] EWHC 1252 (Ch), where the court gave guidance on whether there is an implied undertaking that affidavits filed in previous proceedings will not be disclosed without the court’s permission.

Another amendment clarifies that foreign judgments not requiring registration in order to be enforceable are to be treated, for enforcement purposes, as if they were judgments of the High Court or county court. These will include judgments from EU member states for an extended period, as a result of provisions in the Withdrawal Agreement. 

Issue: 7919 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll