header-logo header-logo

28 February 2014 / Karen Clubb
Issue: 7596 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Redressing the balance?

web_clubb

Will proposed new legislation improve consumer rights? Karen Clubb reports

In August 2012, Jo Swinson, minister for the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS), announced the publication of the draft Consumer Protection Regulations from Unfair Trading (Amendment) Regulations 2013 (CPAR) aiming to place “clarity and fairness at the heart” of the proposed Government reforms. The proposed regulations will amend the previous Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 (SI 2008/1277) (CPR 2008), which implemented the Council Directive 2005/29/EC on Unfair Commercial Practices.

 

The draft CPAR resulted from a wider government review of UK consumer law, which aimed to streamline and reduce the complexity of the current legislative and regulatory framework for consumer law. These changes aim to improve consumer protection, ensuring that consumers are better informed of their rights to prevent situations where “consumers are paying up” or being pursued for debts that they may not legally owe. The CPR 2008 criminalised a range of unfair commercial practices, but offered no redress for consumers; its remedies were confined to civil enforcement by local

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll