header-logo header-logo

03 October 2013
Issue: 7578 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

"Red tape" harassment repeal

Section 40 of the Equality Act 2010 is abolished

Employers’ section 40 requirement to safeguard employees against harassment from clients and customers has been abolished.

Under s 40 of the Equality Act 2010, an employer was liable for harassment of its employees by third parties, such as customers on the shop floor, over whom the employer had no direct control. The liability was triggered where the harassment took place in the course of the employee’s work, the employee had been harassed at least twice before, and the employer knew about it and had not taken reasonable steps to prevent a recurrence.

Section 40 was repealed on 1 October. 

Tom Walker, employment law partner at Manches, says: “The repeal is probably a realistic, practical move in that the vast majority of employees will continue to be protected from harassment by the Equality Act, if they have a protected characteristic. However, it’s always a shame to see some well-principled, perhaps idealistic, piece of legislation being curtailed.”

Walker said the probable reasons for the repeal were that the provisions went further than the relevant Directive required, and it fitted the political climate of cutting “red tape”

 

Issue: 7578 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll