header-logo header-logo

08 December 2011
Issue: 7493 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Red tape crackdown

Exemption from health and safety laws for self-employed?

Self-employed people could be made exempt from health and safety laws as part of a wide-ranging government crackdown on “red tape”.

The government is seeking to tear up large numbers of health and safety regulations “within a few months”, and launched a consultation to this effect last week. From 1 January, a new challenge panel will give businesses an opportunity to dispute the decision of health and safety inspectors and have them immediately overturned if found to be wrong.

The move follows the publication last week of the Löfstedt Review into health and safety legislation, commissioned by the employment minister in March. The government has accepted Professor Ragnar E Löfstedt’s recommendations.

It intends to reduce regulations by more than half in the next three years. It will strengthen the role of the Health and Safety Executive in relation to local authorities, and ensure employers are not held responsible where they have done all they can to manage risks.

TUC general secretary Brendan Barber warns the proposal would “lead to a rise in the number of bogus self-employed in sectors like construction”.
 

Issue: 7493 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll