header-logo header-logo

19 March 2009 / Malcolm Dowden , Elinor Clark
Issue: 7361 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

A recipe for litigation?

Is it safe to complete on the basis of an undertaking? ask Malcolm Dowden & Elinor Clark

* * * * * *

A solicitor who has given an undertaking is obliged to comply with it. If that undertaking is to redeem and discharge a mortgage, the solicitor must secure that result, even if the sale proceeds are insufficient.

Risk of giving an undertaking

Angel Solicitors v Jenkins O'Dowd & Barth [2009] EWHC 46 (Ch), [2009] All ER (D) 133 (Jan) demonstrates the dangers that arise where a seller's solicitor gives an undertaking to redeem and discharge an “all moneys” charge without first obtaining a redemption statement, and securing the lender's agreement to release the property on payment of a specified sum.

The seller's solicitor had proceeded (without checking) on the pre-credit crunch assumption that the lender would be willing to accept 70% of the proceeds of sale of a property to discharge an all-moneys charge. In fact, after completion, the lender agreed to discharge the property only on payment of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll