header-logo header-logo

A recipe for litigation?

19 March 2009 / Malcolm Dowden , Elinor Clark
Issue: 7361 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Is it safe to complete on the basis of an undertaking? ask Malcolm Dowden & Elinor Clark

* * * * * *

A solicitor who has given an undertaking is obliged to comply with it. If that undertaking is to redeem and discharge a mortgage, the solicitor must secure that result, even if the sale proceeds are insufficient.

Risk of giving an undertaking

Angel Solicitors v Jenkins O'Dowd & Barth [2009] EWHC 46 (Ch), [2009] All ER (D) 133 (Jan) demonstrates the dangers that arise where a seller's solicitor gives an undertaking to redeem and discharge an “all moneys” charge without first obtaining a redemption statement, and securing the lender's agreement to release the property on payment of a specified sum.

The seller's solicitor had proceeded (without checking) on the pre-credit crunch assumption that the lender would be willing to accept 70% of the proceeds of sale of a property to discharge an all-moneys charge. In fact, after completion, the lender agreed to discharge the property only on payment of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll