header-logo header-logo

25 June 2009
Issue: 7375 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Employment
printer mail-detail

Recession boosts flexible working uptake in law firms

Internal secondments popular as recession-proofing measure

Flexible working, sabbaticals and part-time working are on the rise as top 100 firms strive to avoid redundancies.

Research by Sweet & Maxwell among 25 of the top 100 commercial law firms shows 44% encouraging employees to take sabbaticals and one in four firms offering part-time working.

A third of firms say they have considered introducing pay cuts, although only one firm has gone ahead and done this.
Nearly one quarter have frozen salaries, while 60% are still considering this option.

Offering lawyers temporary internal secondments was the most popular recession-proofing measure, with more than half of firms moving lawyers from departments that have lost work into busier departments. However, this is not always possible as clients expect highly specialised knowledge and experience from lawyers.

Sabbaticals are the second most popular option, and the third most common measure is to retrain lawyers—42% of firms have adopted this, and 28% are considering it.

Several City law firms, including DLA Piper and Norton Rose, have offered trainees £5,000 and up to £10,000 respectively to defer their starting date and take a paid gap year (subject to certain conditions) until the economic situation improves.

One in five HR directors who took part in the survey said they planned to reduce headcount, nearly a quarter plan to increase headcount, and the majority (56%) plan to keep it the same.
Norton Rose introduced a flexible working scheme in its London office in March, and received approval this month to roll the scheme out across its offices in France and Germany. Its other international offices signed up in May.

Staff can choose to work a four-day week at 85% of base salary, or take a sabbatical of between four and 12 weeks at 30% of base salary.
Spokesman Sean Twomey said the scheme was introduced “partly in response to the recession and partly as an alternative within the firm”.

Issue: 7375 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll