header-logo header-logo

Rebuild & renewal

22 January 2009 / James Naylor , Claire Southway
Issue: 7353 / Categories: Features , Property , Housing
printer mail-detail

James Naylor & Claire Southway explain why Risegold is good news for developers

 

The Court of Appeal has recently provided much food for thought in the case of Risegold Ltd v Escala Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 1180, Risegold Ltd v Escala Ltd [2008] All ER (D) 269 (Oct). It concerned neighbouring freehold premises at Quaker Court, London E1, consisting of warehouse/industrial units, and the extent of an easement granted to the owner of one of those premises, giving it the right to enter into part of the adjoining premises.
In 1993, both Risegold and Escala’s premises were in joint ownership. Title in units 5 and 6 was transferred to Risegold’s predecessors in title on 28 July 1993, and the title in units 3 and 4 to Escala on 6 August 1993.
The grant (or reservation) of the benefit to Risegold was in all material respects identical in both transfers and was in the following terms: “The right (exercisable upon prior notice of not less than forty eight hours given
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll