header-logo header-logo

04 February 2011 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7451 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Ransom note

Nothing like a bit of lawyer-bashing to win over the hearts and minds of the British public...

Are employers being held to ransom by the employment tribunal system, asks Jon Robins

Nothing like a bit of lawyer-bashing to win over the hearts and minds of the British public, at least that’s how it seemed with last month’s proposals to reform the employment tribunals. Sample responses to the consultation paper include: “Too many employers are being held to ransom in employment tribunals by vexatious employees and ‘no win, no fee’ lawyers”, and “for far too long the tribunal system has put the interest of lawyers above those of employers and employees”. These were the views of the  Institute of Directors (IoD) and the Confederation of British Industry (CBI) respectively.

The business secretary Vince Cable told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme that “the fear” of tribunals was “a major impediment” for businesses recovering from the economic downturn and hiring workers. Listeners were told tribunal claims rose to 236,000 last year (“…a record rise of 56% on 2009…”)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll