header-logo header-logo

10 November 2021
Issue: 7956 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Discrimination
printer mail-detail

Race at the Bar: action required

Barristers from ethnic minority backgrounds find it harder to secure pupillage and face systemic obstacles throughout their career, according to a report by the Bar Council’s Race Working Group

It found access to the Bar, career progression, the most prestigious and best paying work, retention, and working environment were all influenced by ethnicity and structural discrimination.

A black woman publicly funded criminal junior barrister with the same level of experience as a white male junior would bill on average £18,700 a year less, and an Asian woman £16,400 less. At all levels, white male barristers earned the highest fee income, women earned less than men, and black women earned the least.

Speaking anonymously, barristers reported ‘there is a need to tone down your blackness’; and ‘it can be invaluable for individuals not to be the only person from an ethnic minority background in the room’.

Some 58% of black and Asian women at the Bar had personally experienced bullying and harassment at work or online, four times more than their white male counterparts. Barristers from ethnic minority backgrounds were more likely to be referred to the regulator.

While Asian judges make up 5% of the judiciary, only 1% of judges are black and 2% are from mixed ethnic backgrounds. Some of the six main practice areas have no QCs from ethnic minority backgrounds at all. In England and Wales in total there are only five black/black British female QCs, and 17 black/black British male QCs.

Barbara Mills QC and Simon Regis, co-chairs of the Group, said: ‘Quite rightly, practising barristers within the profession have expressed frustration over the amount of talk about race inequality at the Bar, and the lack of action and failure to bring about change.’

The report, Race at the Bar, made 23 detailed recommendations, on access, retention, progression and Bar culture. Recommended actions included measures on training, monitoring of work distribution, targeted career support, sponsorship and mentoring.

Issue: 7956 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Discrimination
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll