header-logo header-logo

Race at the Bar: action required

10 November 2021
Issue: 7956 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Discrimination
printer mail-detail
Barristers from ethnic minority backgrounds find it harder to secure pupillage and face systemic obstacles throughout their career, according to a report by the Bar Council’s Race Working Group

It found access to the Bar, career progression, the most prestigious and best paying work, retention, and working environment were all influenced by ethnicity and structural discrimination.

A black woman publicly funded criminal junior barrister with the same level of experience as a white male junior would bill on average £18,700 a year less, and an Asian woman £16,400 less. At all levels, white male barristers earned the highest fee income, women earned less than men, and black women earned the least.

Speaking anonymously, barristers reported ‘there is a need to tone down your blackness’; and ‘it can be invaluable for individuals not to be the only person from an ethnic minority background in the room’.

Some 58% of black and Asian women at the Bar had personally experienced bullying and harassment at work or online, four times more than their white male counterparts. Barristers from ethnic minority backgrounds were more likely to be referred to the regulator.

While Asian judges make up 5% of the judiciary, only 1% of judges are black and 2% are from mixed ethnic backgrounds. Some of the six main practice areas have no QCs from ethnic minority backgrounds at all. In England and Wales in total there are only five black/black British female QCs, and 17 black/black British male QCs.

Barbara Mills QC and Simon Regis, co-chairs of the Group, said: ‘Quite rightly, practising barristers within the profession have expressed frustration over the amount of talk about race inequality at the Bar, and the lack of action and failure to bring about change.’

The report, Race at the Bar, made 23 detailed recommendations, on access, retention, progression and Bar culture. Recommended actions included measures on training, monitoring of work distribution, targeted career support, sponsorship and mentoring.

Issue: 7956 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Discrimination
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll