header-logo header-logo

Rabinder Singh QC High Court judge

03 August 2011
Issue: 7477 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-detail

Rabinder Singh QC has been appointed a High Court judge, to be assigned to the Queen’s Bench Division, from October 2011.

Rabinder was one of the founding members of Matrix Chambers in 2000. In 2001 he was named Barrister of the Year by Lawyer magazine; in 2006 he was the Human Rights Lawyer of the Year. He has been a recorder of the Crown Court since 2004 and a deputy High Court judge since 2003. 

Other silks appointed to High Court judge are: Andrew John Popplewell, Robert Henry Thoroton Hildyard, Charles Anthony Haddon-Cave, and His Honour Judge Henry Brian Globe, QC.
 

Issue: 7477 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll