header-logo header-logo

A quantum leap?

18 September 2008 / David Cartwright
Issue: 7337 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Settling damages for latex allergies may involve a trip to court in future, says David Cartwright

Foxton v Wakefield West Primary Care NHS Trust is the first case where damages for a latex allergy were assessed at trial. Mrs Foxton was was aged 45½ at the date of a two-day assessment of damages hearing. She was employed by Wakefield West Primary Care NHS Trust as a community staff nurse from March 2003.

In 2004 she developed a latex allergy as a result of admitted negligence of the defendant. The allergy forced Mrs Foxton to give up her career as a community nurse, she also suffered a degree of psychological injury and contended that she would never be able to work again. However, the defendant contended that she could have returned to work by April 2006 and on that issue alone the main difference between the parties concerning quantum was that of loss of earnings.

Latex allergy is permanent. From 2004 Mrs Foxton suffered a number of upsetting reactions caused by her proximity to latex,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll