header-logo header-logo

14 May 2009
Issue: 7369 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

QC selection working

Profession

Duncan Nichol has rejected the consideration of “additional forms of excellence” in his report into the selection procedure for Queen’s Counsel appointments, published last week.

He had been asked to consider whether “additional forms of excellence such as both litigation and nonlitigation work for partners in law firms, or wholly advisory work by lawyers in non-judicial fora, or the work of general counsel should and could be recognised by the same award of silk”.

However, Sir Duncan advised against this, stating: “It is not the right time to reignite the debate that was resolved between the Bar Council and the Law Society and approved by the lord chancellor as recently as three years ago.

“The new process is still relatively immature and vulnerable. It is also capable of being refined and approved within its current purpose and to that end the review has made a number of recommendations.”

Overall, he found the system worked well, and recommended the promotion of the QC honoris causa award to practising lawyers for a wide range of achievements.

Professor Dame Joan Higgins has been appointed as the new lay chairman of the QC Selection Panel, replacing Baroness Butler-Sloss.

Issue: 7369 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll