header-logo header-logo

QC Selection Biased

22 January 2009
Issue: 7353 / Categories: Legal News , Practice areas , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-detail

Solicitors claim the silk selection procedure is biased towards barristers and too costly and time consuming to complete. 

Solicitors claim the silk selection procedure is biased towards barristers and too costly and time consuming to complete. Since 2005, QCs have been appointed by a selection panel in an open competition. Earlier this month, a Law Society survey among 170 solicitors found the majority thought the current system favoured barristers, and had concerns about the cost and length of time required. Of 20 solicitors who considered applying in the last three years, only three had actually applied. The main reasons given were cost and a belief that they would be unlikely to succeed. It costs £2,500 to apply for Silk, and a further £3,500 on appointment. The Bar Council and Law Society are considering a review by Sir Duncan Nichol into the appointment system, which suggests what forms of excellence it should recognise as well as what criteria should be used to assess applicants. 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

Dorsey & Whitney—Jonathan Christy

Dorsey & Whitney—Jonathan Christy

Dispute resolution team welcomes associate in London

Winckworth Sherwood—Kevin McManamon

Winckworth Sherwood—Kevin McManamon

Special education needs and mental capacity expert joins as partner

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In NLJ this week, Ian Smith, emeritus professor at UEA, explores major developments in employment law from the Supreme Court and appellate courts
Writing in NLJ this week, Kamran Rehman and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper examine Operafund Eco-Invest SICAV plc v Spain, where the Commercial Court held that ICSID and Energy Charter Treaty awards cannot be assigned
back-to-top-scroll