header-logo header-logo

07 June 2012
Issue: 7517 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Qatada Olympic blow

Terrorist suspect refused bail due to Olympic security fears

Mr Justice Mitting has refused bail to terror suspect Abu Qatada, partly due to the extra pressures faced by the security services in the run-up to the Olympics.

Mitting J said that, by the time the Special Immigration Appeal Commission (SIAC) hears Qatada’s case: “He will have been deprived of his liberty, for the most part detained, without charge for some seven years and three months.”

However, there was a “real possibility” the SIAC hearing, due to take place in October, would put an end to the litigation that has prevented Qatada’s deportation to Jordan. Therefore, the risk of his absconding has increased. Parties, including some said to come from Al Qaeda, have made threats which suggest they may help him to abscond, Mitting J said.

The police and security services have limits on their resources and “a high level of demand” would be placed on those resources by the preparation for the Olympics.

“If the appellant were to abscond, then either the resources which should be devoted to those ends would have to be diverted to finding him or finding him would be afforded a lower priority than should be the case,” he said.

“In those circumstances, I am satisfied that managing the risk posed by the appellant outside a category A prison during that exceptional time would be exceptionally problematic.”

Issue: 7517 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll