header-logo header-logo

16 July 2025
Issue: 8125 / Categories: Legal News , Property , Conveyancing
printer mail-detail

Putting an end to chancel searches?

The Law Commission has proposed reforms to the rules of chancel repair obligations—a duty on homeowners which adds millions to conveyancing costs each year

The responsibility to repair the chancel (eastern end) of a parish church passed from parish priests to lay landowners after the Reformation and dissolution of the monasteries in the 16th century. All landowners, including of commercial and agricultural property, are potentially affected. Moreover, the liability is personal—not limited to the property value—and several, which means any one landowner can be pursued for the full amount.

Conveyancing searches for chancel repair liability typically add £30-£40 per transaction, which cumulatively add millions of pounds to property sales each year.

The potential risks of chancel repair liability came to the fore in a high-profile case in the 1990s, when a couple, Andrew and Gail Wallbank, were landed with a bill for nearly £187,000 in chancel repairs followed by £250,000 in legal costs, in Aston Cantlow and Wilmcote with Billesley Parochial Church Council v Wallbank [2003] UKHL 37. Consequently, the Land Registration Act 2002 removed the liability as an ‘overriding interest’ from October 2013. However, its legal status remained unclear.

The Law Commission therefore proposes amending the 2002 Act to clarify that purchasers of registered land can only be bound by the liability if it appears on the property title.

Sir Peter Fraser, chair of the Law Commission, said: ‘These proposals aim to deliver the certainty that was intended when the land registration rules changed in 2013.

‘By clarifying the law, the aim is to reduce unnecessary costs for those who buy land such as homebuyers, while ensuring the rules work as Parliament expected.’

The consultation also examines the scope of liability in Wales, which is subject to the Welsh Church Act 1914.

The consultation, ‘Chancel repair liability and registration’, opened this week and ends on 15 November.

Issue: 8125 / Categories: Legal News , Property , Conveyancing
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll