header-logo header-logo

Pure Silk

24 January 2008
Issue: 7305 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Training & education , Profession
printer mail-detail

Profession

Ninety-eight new silks have been appointed by the Queen’s Counsel Appointments selection panel. Just under a third of applicants were successful and only 20 women made the cut this year, against 33 in 2006. Bar Council chair­man Tim Dutton QC says the interim appointment scheme, which was set up in 2005, is settling in. “I hope that this will be continued with an annual list, which has a fixed date for appoint­ments. It is important for practitioners to work to a consistent and regular timeta­ble, so they can be certain about when they will have the opportunity to apply for silk, and know how long the process will take,” he adds.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll