header-logo header-logo

28 November 2024
Issue: 8097 / Categories: Legal News , Class actions , ESG , Competition , Compensation
printer mail-detail

Public now view litigation as a means to drive ethical behaviour

Attitudes to class actions are shifting among the general public and business leaders, research shows.

A report published by Portland this week, based on a poll of 2,000 people and 540 UK business leaders, found a growing majority of the public have a positive view of class actions as a way to win compensation, improve corporate behaviour and hold companies accountable for their actions. Some 65% of respondents would sign up to a class action and 57% believe class actions ‘often’ win compensation for claimants (up from 44% who held this view in 2023). Half of the respondents agreed class actions drive improvements in corporate behaviour.

However, the report, ‘Reputation and accountability: class actions, ESG and values-driven litigation’, also detected low public awareness of people’s eligibility to claim compensation in high-profile actions. Only 22% of the public knew they could claim compensation in Competition Appeal Tribunal claims, despite several high-stakes cases in recent years.

Among business leaders polled, more than three-quarters (77%) agreed directors have a duty to mitigate their company’s climate risks and two-thirds supported legal action to hold governments to account for climate breaches. Some 72% supported the use of litigation against companies accused of human rights in their supply chains, and more than two-thirds believe the increase in group litigation will improve corporate behaviour.

Simon Pugh, head of Portland’s litigation and disputes practice, said: ‘The data shows some really big shifts.

‘For the first time ever, our data provides real insight into how litigation with a moral and ethical purpose is being perceived by business leaders. Businesses need to adapt to these legal risks posed by a rapidly evolving legal environment; especially as new regulation takes hold.

‘But they must also be alive to the mood of the public on these issues. Companies who find themselves involved in litigation will find the risk to their reputation presents more challenges than just uncomfortable headlines.’

Issue: 8097 / Categories: Legal News , Class actions , ESG , Competition , Compensation
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll