header-logo header-logo

Public now view litigation as a means to drive ethical behaviour

28 November 2024
Issue: 8097 / Categories: Legal News , Class actions , ESG , Competition , Compensation
printer mail-detail
Attitudes to class actions are shifting among the general public and business leaders, research shows.

A report published by Portland this week, based on a poll of 2,000 people and 540 UK business leaders, found a growing majority of the public have a positive view of class actions as a way to win compensation, improve corporate behaviour and hold companies accountable for their actions. Some 65% of respondents would sign up to a class action and 57% believe class actions ‘often’ win compensation for claimants (up from 44% who held this view in 2023). Half of the respondents agreed class actions drive improvements in corporate behaviour.

However, the report, ‘Reputation and accountability: class actions, ESG and values-driven litigation’, also detected low public awareness of people’s eligibility to claim compensation in high-profile actions. Only 22% of the public knew they could claim compensation in Competition Appeal Tribunal claims, despite several high-stakes cases in recent years.

Among business leaders polled, more than three-quarters (77%) agreed directors have a duty to mitigate their company’s climate risks and two-thirds supported legal action to hold governments to account for climate breaches. Some 72% supported the use of litigation against companies accused of human rights in their supply chains, and more than two-thirds believe the increase in group litigation will improve corporate behaviour.

Simon Pugh, head of Portland’s litigation and disputes practice, said: ‘The data shows some really big shifts.

‘For the first time ever, our data provides real insight into how litigation with a moral and ethical purpose is being perceived by business leaders. Businesses need to adapt to these legal risks posed by a rapidly evolving legal environment; especially as new regulation takes hold.

‘But they must also be alive to the mood of the public on these issues. Companies who find themselves involved in litigation will find the risk to their reputation presents more challenges than just uncomfortable headlines.’

Issue: 8097 / Categories: Legal News , Class actions , ESG , Competition , Compensation
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll