IPP prisoners, Parole Board, Injunctions
IPP PRISONERS
In Secretary of State for Justice v Walker and James [2008] EWCA Civ 30, [2008] All ER (D) 15 (Feb) the Court of Appeal considered the lawfulness of the failure of the secretary of state to provide offending behaviour courses for prisoners serving sentences of indeterminate detention for public protection (IPP) and whether or not that failure rendered the detention unlawful.
The challenge
The respondent prisoners were both serving IPP sentences under s 225 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 (CJA 2003). These sentences comprise two components:
- a minimum term to be served to meet the requirements of retribution and deterrence; and
- thereafter a preventative component when continued detention will be justified so long as the prisoner continues to pose an unacceptable risk to the public.
Such sentences engage Art 5(4) of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention) when the preventative phase is entered and at regular intervals thereafter,
.tmb-mov69x69.jpg?sfvrsn=e3c4b2f1_1)
