header-logo header-logo

Book review: Public Law after the Human Rights Act

12 August 2010
Issue: 7430 / Categories: Blogs , Public , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Published 10 years after the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA) came into force, Tom Hickman’s recent book is an impressive critique of the complex relationship between public law and the HRA.

BOOK REVIEW

Public Law after the Human Rights Act
Author: Tom Hickman
Publisher: Hart Publishing (May 2010)
ISBN: 978-1841139692 Price: £45.00

The complexity of that relationship is particularly evident from the book’s contrasting emphasis on the centrality of the Act to the legal system as a whole, and on the fraught relationship resulting from its position within the context of the well established principles of public law.

Key questions

Throughout the book, Hickman grapples with a number of key questions, such as the function of public law, the status and nature of the HRA, and the HRA’s relationship with common law. In doing so, he provides a well-measured assessment of different arguments, heavily drawn from relevant case-law and academia. Having analysed these differing views, he presents convincing, albeit far from universally accepted, conclusions. The author reaches a number of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll