header-logo header-logo

Public baffled by privacy notices

02 July 2009
Issue: 7376 / Categories: Legal News , Data protection
printer mail-detail

Code of practice highlights best (and worst) practices in data privacy

The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has called for an overhaul of privacy notices that leave consumers baffled by unnecessary legalese.
Consumer research by the ICO shows that half of consumers don’t understand what they’re signing up to when they fill in online and paper forms. The ICO launched a privacy notices code of practice in June to help organisations provide more user-friendly privacy and marketing notices.
Privacy notices are the oral or written statements that individuals are given when information is collected about them, and explains who is collecting the information, what is going to be done with it, and who it will be shared with. The privacy notice can go beyond this, for example, by explaining access rights and rights of complaint.

Tom Morrison, associate, Rollits, says: “In an attempt to comply with the law some organisations have lost sight of the primary purpose of a privacy notice; to enable individuals to ascertain how their personal information will be handled, rather than to tick a box saying that a section of the Data Protection Act 1998 has been complied with. 

“The effectiveness of a privacy notice is generally inversely proportionate to its length and complexity. As notices get more detailed the ability to get through to the key points becomes increasingly difficult, and it has reached the stage where individuals can no longer see at a glance how their information will be handled.

“This has been identified as a particular issue over recent years, which led the Article 29 Working Party, a group which co-ordinates the approach taken by information commissioners throughout Europe, to propose a code of practice. It is out of this that the UK’s information commissioner pushed for a code highlighting what he considers to be best—and worst—practice. 

“The code is no substitute for taking sound legal advice and has no legal effect in itself, but it is certainly a positive development and a tool which should have an impact on the approach organisations take to designing comprehensive but easy to understand privacy notices.”

Chris Graham, the former director general of the Advertising Standards Authority, took over from outgoing information commissioner, Richard Thomas, in June.

Issue: 7376 / Categories: Legal News , Data protection
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
back-to-top-scroll