header-logo header-logo

09 January 2026
Issue: 8145 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Public Accounts Committee warn of ‘extinction’ risk for legal aid

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned

In a devastating report issued this week, the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) said large gaps in provision exist in parts of the country, particularly for housing and debt advice, despite the committee highlighting the issue in 2024. Last year, the government committed an extra £20m to early advice housing and immigration legal aid—the first increase since 1996.

Referring to LASPO (the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012), the committee said the MoJ has not fully grasped the impact of removing access to most early legal advice more than a decade ago, which research suggests is leading to additional costs in the system.

The committee highlighted the danger of over-reliance on remote advice while almost one quarter (about 24%) of people have difficulty accessing digital and online technology. It also sought clarity on whether enough is being done to address risks in legal aid systems, following the cyber-attack at the Legal Aid Agency (LAA) in December 2024, which was not discovered until April last year and which exposed personal data of legal aid clients.

Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown, chair, PAC, said: ‘The reforms of a decade ago are now at serious risk of going down in history as an extinction event for the entitlement to access to legal advice in large parts of the country.

‘Our report finds government remaining stubbornly uninterested in whether this is the case, but it must now wake up on this subject.’

Liz Bayram, chief executive of AdviceUK, said: ‘Our members who provide legal aid services have repeatedly raised these concerns, and it is positive to see the committee making clear not only what needs to change but the urgency with which these changes must happen.

‘We also call for independent advice to be recognised and funded as part of the UK’s essential justice infrastructure. Embedded in their communities, advice services are often the first and most trusted source of help for individuals, including marginalised groups who would otherwise remain excluded from the justice system.’

Law Society president Mark Evans said: ‘Despite some recent improvement, the government has not done enough to put legal aid on a sustainable footing.

‘We welcome the recommendations set out by the Public Accounts Committee and share the view that the MoJ should routinely review profitability and sustainability for all types of legal aid. We also agree that the MoJ should make public the lessons learned from the LAA cyber-attack and whether funding and provisions are in place to stop it happening again.

‘We had long warned about the LAA’s antiquated computer systems. Their fragility has prevented vital reforms, including updates to the means test that could help millions more access legal aid. The cyber-attack has delayed their implementation even further. The MoJ must publish a timetable for implementing all the means test changes.’

Issue: 8145 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll