header-logo header-logo

29 November 2007 / Seamus Burns
Issue: 7299 / Categories: Features , EU , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Protesting their innocence

Seamus Burns is concerned that executive blunderbuss could blow away the rights of peaceful demonstrators

T he recent Court of Appeal decision in Austin and another v Metropolitan Police Commissioner [2007] EWCA Civ 989, [2007] All ER (D) 197 (Oct), signals a worryingly restrictive and diluted interpretation of Art 5 (right to liberty) of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention) allied to a correspondingly generous interpretation of police powers controlling protest in a democratic society.

MAY DAY BLUES

The facts of this case are well known. On May Day 2001 (not a Bank Holiday) at about 2pm, a crowd of demonstrators marched into Oxford Circus in London from Regent Street South. Later, other people entered or tried to enter from all points of the compass. Hence, at the end of the day there were around 3,000 people in Oxford Circus. Furthermore, in the general vicinity were crowds of thousands to the north of Oxford Street and on the west side of Oxford Street.

The Metropolitan Police had information that a demonstration

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll