header-logo header-logo

17 November 2017 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7770 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Protecting the pedestrian

nlj_7770_samuels

Alec Samuels addresses an irresponsible minority & lays down the law for safer pavements

The pedestrian on the footway needs protection from the unlawful or irresponsible cyclist and mobility scooter driver. The pedestrian has been intimidated, knocked down and injured. The pedestrian may be a child, an old person, a disabled person, indeed anybody. Abuse of the footway is rife, albeit by a minority of irresponsible people.

Careless cycling is an offence (Road Traffic Act 1988 s 29, penalty level 3 fine), and dangerous cycling is an offence (Road Traffic Act 1988 s 28, penalty level 4 fine). Doing or causing to be done bodily harm by wanton or furious driving of any carriage (which includes cycle) is an offence (Offences Against the Person Act 1861 s 35, penalty maximum two years).

Charlie Alliston who caused the death of a pedestrian on the carriageway by wanton or furious driving of an unroadworthy cycle was convicted not of manslaughter but of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861, and sentenced in September 2017 to 18 months

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll