header-logo header-logo

15 August 2023
Issue: 8038 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Proposals to clarify parity of CILEX lawyers & solicitors

CILEX lawyers could be given clearer professional titles to improve public understanding of their role and equivalence with solicitors, as part of a regulatory shake-up

The Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEX) launched a consultation, Enhancing consumer trust & confidence, this week on a series of regulatory proposals. They include introducing specialist Chartered Lawyer titles to clarify that CILEX Lawyers with independent practice rights have parity with solicitor counterparts in these areas of practice. The Chartered Lawyer title awarded to CILEX Fellows on qualification would therefore reflect their specialist practice areas, for example, Chartered Property Lawyer and Chartered Corporate Lawyer.

The consultation also proposes the Solicitors Regulation Authority take over the regulation of CILEX members, and that voting rights be extended to all CILEX members instead of the current position where only CILEX Fellows have a vote. It proposes creating a paralegal standards framework and career ladder that offers the opportunity to become a Chartered Paralegal linked to a professional register, and creating a ‘legal technologist’ membership grade as part of preparations for an apprenticeship that is currently being developed.

The proposals guarantee the distinct identity of CILEX Lawyers, Paralegals and CILEX-led entities will be maintained, along with the separate CILEX route into law.

CILEX Chair, Professor Chris Bones said: ‘Following recent successes removing legislative, policy and funding barriers, we are pushing on with our reform agenda, looking at how we can create a sustainable regulatory framework with the drive towards a more diverse, accessible and equitable legal profession at its heart.’

CILEX CEO, Linda Ford said: ‘We want to encourage both the legal profession and consumer bodies to engage with this consultation process so that we can ensure that the changes we make benefit both society and the legal sector.’

The consultation is open until 5 November 2023.

Issue: 8038 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll