header-logo header-logo

Property complaints top negligence league

12 July 2007
Issue: 7281 / Categories: Legal News , Property
printer mail-detail

News

Errors in residential property and re-mortgages were the most common source of professional negligence claims in the 2005–06 insurance year, according to professional indemnity insurer Zurich Professional.
For the sixth year running, the insurer says, such mistakes were the most frequent, accounting for 35% of all the claims and circumstances notified.
The most common problems were: inadequate investigation of title; failing to identify and deal with all the mortgages and other encumbrances affecting the property, failing to undertake appropriate searches and inquiries or failing to advise on the results; and failing to advise co-purchaser clients on co-ownership options.

Commercial property accounted for 11% of all notifications. Many of the mistakes made in residential property also cropped up, although failing to advise fully, accurately or at all on the terms of leases is also a common error, with solicitors failing to ensure clients understand issues such as rent reviews, the operation of break clauses and the extent of dilapidation liabilities.

Andrew Nickels, risk manager at Zurich, says his firm welcomes the new Solicitors’ Code of Conduct 2007 and particularly rule 5 which makes a commitment to risk management, a professional conduct requirement.
Nickels says: “The new Rule 5 imposes strict requirements on principals in firms to ensure that adequate supervisory systems are in place. Given the basic nature of the errors that give rise to most property related claims and the tendency of some firms to use unqualified people for parts of the process, it is to be hoped that a greater emphasis on supervision will lead to a reduction in claims against conveyancers.”

He says the new rule should hopefully lead to fewer negligence claims.
“If principals accept responsibility for the management of risk and error prevention is embedded in all of the internal systems and controls of every legal practice, then we should see a corresponding reduction in errors that lead to allegations of negligence.”

Errors in litigation made up 22% of all claims and circumstances notified, with most relating to missed time limits: missed limitation periods were the most common problem, followed by failing to effect service of the claim form in time.

Company/commercial claims make up only 4% of all notifications, but, Nickels says, this is often outweighed by the value of the claims that result. Common mistakes included: incorrect drafting of documentation; not checking wording or formulae; solicitors failing to identify their client or failing to identify conflicts of interest; and failing to define the scope and limits of the retainer.

Issue: 7281 / Categories: Legal News , Property
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll