header-logo header-logo

Probate hike warning

12 December 2018
Issue: 7821 / Categories: Legal News , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

The Lord Chancellor could be acting ultra vires if proposals to introduce a sliding scale for probate fees go ahead, MPs and peers have warned.

Currently, the fee for probate is £215 for individuals and £155 for individuals applying through a solicitor. Last month, the Ministry of Justice published a statutory instrument—yet to be approved by Parliament—that proposed linking fees to the value of the deceased’s estate, up to a maximum of £6,000 for estates worth more than £2m.

All profits generated would go to the Courts and Tribunals Service.

In a report published last week, however, the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments said fees should bear some relationship to the service provided. It noted that probate is ‘an administrative process’ unlike a decision to commence litigation. This ‘makes it difficult for the Committee to accept that a power to charge enhanced court fees can be extended naturally to require probate fees to reflect the general costs of the court and tribunal system.’

Issue: 7821 / Categories: Legal News , Wills & Probate
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll